Gulf of Tonkin, 30 July to 8 August 1964, and after: who did what, and when

As of 2026-10-02. Times are UTC. Washington was on daylight time (UTC-4) and the Tonkin Gulf is UTC+7, so the same moment reads 11 hours later in the Gulf than in Washington. One source (Prados) converts at UTC-5, which would make Washington clock times an hour later than drawn here; events given in Washington clock time (the calls, the Herrick message, the staff meeting) therefore carry about one hour of uncertainty. Panel B shows both clocks for that reason. Events whose exact time is not given are hollow or shown as bars. Quoted facts were read in the cited documents, as marked.

Shape = kind of source: machine-recorded data a primary document an official statement a person's account a scholar's account a news report Style = status: 2+ sources agree one source sources differ our inference / time not reported the same event at another source's time Every dot is a link to its main source; the table lists all sources.

Panel A: 30 July to 8 August 1964 (UTC, one tick per day)

Click a dot to open its source. Scroll sideways on a phone.

30 Jul 00:00 31 Jul 00:00 01 Aug 00:00 02 Aug 00:00 03 Aug 00:00 04 Aug 00:00 05 Aug 00:00 06 Aug 00:00 07 Aug 00:00 08 Aug 00:00 09 Aug 00:00 Time, UTC Covert OPLAN 34-A raids USS Maddox and Turner Joy White House, McNamara (Washington) Congress CIA and NSA 1. 34-A raid on Hon Me and Hon Ngu (about 00:30 on 31 July, local) (single, analysis). Prados: the raid 'hit at half past midnight, July 31'. Local time is UTC+7, so about 17:30 UTC on 30 July.1 4. Second 34-A raid, night of 3/4 August (time not stated) (inferred, analysis). Prados: another raid on the night of 3/4 August as the destroyers began their run back up the Gulf. The bar is an inference for the local night, not a stated time.4 2. 2 Aug: Maddox fires three warning rounds; North Vietnamese boats attack (reported, analysis). Hanyok: about 1505 Gulf time (08:05 UTC) the Maddox fired three rounds to warn off the boats; the administration did not report this and said the Vietnamese boats fired first. Jets from the Ticonderoga arrived within about fifteen minutes; one boat was left dead in the water and two damaged.2 3. McNamara to LBJ (10:30 a.m. EDT): explain OPLAN 34-A to Congress (reported, document). Transcription: 'explain this Op Plan 34-A, these covert operations. There's no question but what that had bearing on.'3 5. 5 Aug: US retaliatory air strikes on North Vietnam (single, analysis). Hanyok refers to 'the retaliatory air strikes of 5 August'. Time of day not given here.5 6. 6 Aug: McNamara tells senators the Navy 'was not aware of' South Vietnamese actions (single, analysis). Quoted by Prados from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee's published executive sessions (vol. XVI, p. 293); the record was not read directly.6 7. 6 Aug: Fulbright opens the Senate debate and states the 4 August attack as fact (single, official). Fulbright: 'On August 4 the Maddox and another destroyer, the C. Turner Joy, were again attacked by North Vietnamese torpedo boats in international waters ... without any doubt a calculated act of military aggression.' Congressional Record, Senate, 6 Aug 1964, p. 18399, read on the page image. See claim tonkin-fulbright-opening-aug4-as-fact.7 8. 7 Aug: Tonkin Gulf Resolution passes (House 416-0, Senate 88-2) (reported, official). Signed 10 August. Senate: read in the Congressional Record, p. 18470 (yeas 88, nays 2: Gruening and Morse; 10 not voting). House: the Record prints 416-0 on Roll No. 210 (p. 18555), under suspension of the rules (see claim tonkin-house-debate-aug7).8 9. 8 Aug: CIA cover note sends Bundy the selected intercepts (single, document). Prados: a cover note of 8 August accompanied the intercepts 'selected by CIA and NSA' that the White House had requested.9

Panel B: 4 and 5 August 1964 in hours (UTC, with Washington and Gulf clocks)

Click a dot to open its source. Scroll sideways on a phone.

10:00 06:00 17:00 12:00 08:00 19:00 14:00 10:00 21:00 16:00 12:00 23:00 18:00 14:00 01:00 20:00 16:00 03:00 22:00 18:00 05:00 00:00 20:00 07:00 02:00 22:00 09:00 04:00 00:00 11:00 06:00 02:00 13:00 08:00 04:00 15:00 10:00 06:00 17:00 12:00 08:00 19:00 14:00 10:00 21:00 Time, UTC Washington (EDT, UTC-4) Tonkin Gulf (UTC+7) North Vietnamese navy (as shown in intercepts) USS Maddox and Turner Joy Capt. Herrick (on-scene commander) NSA and listening posts White House, McNamara (Washington) 10. Report 7: boats told to be ready for 'military operations' that night (single, document). Read: 'imminent plans of DRV naval action possibly against Desoto mission'; T-142 and T-146 to ready, T-333 to join if oil can be found. Date-time group 04/1140Z per Prados (the OCR of the group is unclear). Hanyok reads later Phu Bai reports as a salvage and tow operation.10 16. Report 13: 'we shot at two enemy airplanes... we sacrificed two comrades' (reported, document). Read. The report speaks of aircraft, not ships. Hanyok: it appears to combine two separate messages into one translation, and 'comrades' was rendered as 'boats'; the original Vietnamese text cannot be located.16 11. Destroyers' first reported radar sightings (04/1240Z) (single, analysis). Prados. The base of the Swatow boats, Quang Khe, was about 110 nautical miles from Hon Me, too far to reach in the time between the intercept and this report.11 14. Destroyers report evading torpedoes and having 'sunk' a craft (04/1602Z) (single, analysis). Prados. Stockdale, overhead, saw no boats and later wrote 'absolutely no gunfire except our own'.14 17. Herrick's doubt message SENT (1:27 p.m. Washington time) (disputed, analysis). Prados, quoting a 28 Aug 1964 chronology: contacts 'appear doubtful'; 'freak weather effects' and 'over-eager sonarmen'; 'no visual sightings'. DISCREPANCIES: (1) earlier reports said the message was received at 1:27 p.m.; the chronology says sent. (2) The bar spans 17:27 to 18:27 UTC because it is unclear whether 'Washington time' means daylight time (UTC-4) or the UTC-5 that Prados uses to convert. The message itself was not read.17! 15. Report 12: boat reports an enemy aircraft falling into the sea (single, document). Read: 'enemy aircraft was observed falling into the sea; enemy vessel perhaps wounded'. Mentions aircraft; the date-time group in the OCR is smudged (04/1630Z per Prados).15 12. McNamara to LBJ (9:43 a.m. EDT): ship 'allegedly' to be attacked tonight (reported, document). Read in transcription: 'this ship is allegedly uh to be attacked tonight'. Before any attack on the destroyers was reported. Conditional planning followed ('in the event he is attacked').12 13. McNamara to LBJ (10:53 a.m. EDT): reports the supposed engagement (single, document). Per the tapes commentary, McNamara 'mistakenly reports' what the aircraft saw. Details of the call were not read in full.13 18. White House staff meeting memo (8 a.m. EDT): evidence 'less than we had yesterday' (reported, document). Read. Bundy: evidence for the second attack 'less than we had yesterday', 'eliminating double counting and mistaken signals'; 'This much seemed certain: There was an attack.' Also: he 'welcomed the recent events as justification for a resolution the Administration had wanted for some time.'18

Panel C: afterwards, 1964 to 2005 (one tick per five years)

Click a dot to open its source. Scroll sideways on a phone.

1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 Time, UTC Congress Testimony and talks NSA internal record Declassification 20. 24 Jun 1970: Senate votes 81-10 to repeal the Tonkin Resolution (Dole amendment) (single, official). Read in the Congressional Record, p. 21132 [No. 167 Leg.]. The ten nays include Fulbright, who said in the same debate 'I am going to vote for its repeal' and objected to the procedure (p. 21119). See claim tonkin-resolution-repealed-1970. Voteview record: To amend h.r. 15628 by repealing the gulf of tonkin resolution effective at the end of the 91st congress. Result: n/a; yea 81, nay 10. Roll call 398.20 19. 1968: McNamara cites 'unimpeachable' intercepts to the Senate; does not leave copies (single, analysis). Opening statement of 20 February 1968, quoted by Prados.19 22. 1995: Giap tells McNamara in Hanoi that nothing happened on 4 Aug (single, media). Seattle Times report of the 9 Nov 1995 meeting.22 23. 1997: Hanoi conference; Giap says 2 Aug was ordered by a local command (single, analysis). Prados attended; he reports Giap's statement to McNamara (his note 13).23 21. 1972: NSA's deputy director concedes the 4 Aug intercept could refer to 2 Aug (single, analysis). Hanyok's note 7: a 20 January 1972 meeting between Dr. Louis Tordella and SFRC staff chief Carl Marcy; Tordella could not produce the original.21 24. Early 2001: Hanyok study in NSA's classified Cryptologic Quarterly (single, document). Per the National Security Archive's 2005 posting.24 25. March 2003: the five intercept reports declassified (reported, document). Prados: declassified in March 2003 on a Mandatory Declassification Review request. The scan carries a NARA review stamp dated 3-13-03.25 26. 1 Dec 2005: NSA declassifies about 140 documents, including the Hanyok study (reported, document). National Security Archive posting of 1 December 2005.26

Events (numbers match the diagram)

#When (UTC)WhatStatusSources
130 Jul 1964 17:30 (approx.)34-A raid on Hon Me and Hon Ngu (about 00:30 on 31 July, local)
Prados: the raid 'hit at half past midnight, July 31'. Local time is UTC+7, so about 17:30 UTC on 30 July.
single analysisn:tonkin-1964-07-30-34-a-raid-on-hon-me-and:0
202 Aug 1964 08:05 (approx.)2 Aug: Maddox fires three warning rounds; North Vietnamese boats attack
Hanyok: about 1505 Gulf time (08:05 UTC) the Maddox fired three rounds to warn off the boats; the administration did not report this and said the Vietnamese boats fired first. Jets from the Ticonderoga arrived within about fifteen minutes; one boat was left dead in the water and two damaged.
reported analysismain link, n:tonkin-1964-08-02-maddox-fires-three-warning-rounds-north-vietnamese:0, n:tonkin-1964-08-02-maddox-fires-three-warning-rounds-north-vietnamese:1
303 Aug 1964 14:30McNamara to LBJ (10:30 a.m. EDT): explain OPLAN 34-A to Congress
Transcription: 'explain this Op Plan 34-A, these covert operations. There's no question but what that had bearing on.'
reported documentn:tonkin-1964-08-03-mcnamara-to-lbj-explain-oplan-34-a:0, n:tonkin-1964-08-03-mcnamara-to-lbj-explain-oplan-34-a:1
403 Aug 1964 17:00 to 23:00Second 34-A raid, night of 3/4 August (time not stated)
Prados: another raid on the night of 3/4 August as the destroyers began their run back up the Gulf. The bar is an inference for the local night, not a stated time.
inferred analysisn:tonkin-1964-08-03-second-34-a-raid-night-of-3:0
505 Aug 1964 (date only)5 Aug: US retaliatory air strikes on North Vietnam
Hanyok refers to 'the retaliatory air strikes of 5 August'. Time of day not given here.
single analysismain link, n:tonkin-1964-08-05-us-retaliatory-air-strikes-on-north-vietnam:0
606 Aug 1964 (date only)6 Aug: McNamara tells senators the Navy 'was not aware of' South Vietnamese actions
Quoted by Prados from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee's published executive sessions (vol. XVI, p. 293); the record was not read directly.
single analysisn:tonkin-1964-08-06-mcnamara-tells-senators-the-navy-was-not:0
706 Aug 1964 (date only)6 Aug: Fulbright opens the Senate debate and states the 4 August attack as fact
Fulbright: 'On August 4 the Maddox and another destroyer, the C. Turner Joy, were again attacked by North Vietnamese torpedo boats in international waters ... without any doubt a calculated act of military aggression.' Congressional Record, Senate, 6 Aug 1964, p. 18399, read on the page image. See claim tonkin-fulbright-opening-aug4-as-fact.
single officialn:tonkin-1964-08-06-fulbright-opens-senate-debate-aug4-as-fact:0
807 Aug 1964 (date only)7 Aug: Tonkin Gulf Resolution passes (House 416-0, Senate 88-2)
Signed 10 August. Senate: read in the Congressional Record, p. 18470 (yeas 88, nays 2: Gruening and Morse; 10 not voting). House: the Record prints 416-0 on Roll No. 210 (p. 18555), under suspension of the rules (see claim tonkin-house-debate-aug7).
reported officialmain link, n:tonkin-1964-08-07-tonkin-gulf-resolution-passes:0, n:tonkin-1964-08-07-tonkin-gulf-resolution-passes:1, n:tonkin-1964-08-07-tonkin-gulf-resolution-passes:2, n:tonkin-1964-08-07-tonkin-gulf-resolution-passes:3, n:tonkin-1964-08-07-tonkin-gulf-resolution-passes:4
908 Aug 1964 (date only)8 Aug: CIA cover note sends Bundy the selected intercepts
Prados: a cover note of 8 August accompanied the intercepts 'selected by CIA and NSA' that the White House had requested.
single documentn:tonkin-1964-08-08-cia-cover-note-sends-bundy-the-selected:0
1004 Aug 1964 11:40Report 7: boats told to be ready for 'military operations' that night
Read: 'imminent plans of DRV naval action possibly against Desoto mission'; T-142 and T-146 to ready, T-333 to join if oil can be found. Date-time group 04/1140Z per Prados (the OCR of the group is unclear). Hanyok reads later Phu Bai reports as a salvage and tow operation.
single documentmain link, n:tonkin-1964-08-04-report-7-boats-told-to-be-ready:0, n:tonkin-1964-08-04-report-7-boats-told-to-be-ready:1
1104 Aug 1964 12:40Destroyers' first reported radar sightings (04/1240Z)
Prados. The base of the Swatow boats, Quang Khe, was about 110 nautical miles from Hon Me, too far to reach in the time between the intercept and this report.
single analysisn:tonkin-1964-08-04-destroyers-first-reported-radar-sightings:0
1204 Aug 1964 13:43McNamara to LBJ (9:43 a.m. EDT): ship 'allegedly' to be attacked tonight
Read in transcription: 'this ship is allegedly uh to be attacked tonight'. Before any attack on the destroyers was reported. Conditional planning followed ('in the event he is attacked').
reported documentn:tonkin-1964-08-04-mcnamara-to-lbj-ship-allegedly-to-be:0, n:tonkin-1964-08-04-mcnamara-to-lbj-ship-allegedly-to-be:1
1304 Aug 1964 14:53McNamara to LBJ (10:53 a.m. EDT): reports the supposed engagement
Per the tapes commentary, McNamara 'mistakenly reports' what the aircraft saw. Details of the call were not read in full.
single documentn:tonkin-1964-08-04-mcnamara-to-lbj-reports-the-supposed-engagement:0
1404 Aug 1964 16:02Destroyers report evading torpedoes and having 'sunk' a craft (04/1602Z)
Prados. Stockdale, overhead, saw no boats and later wrote 'absolutely no gunfire except our own'.
single analysisn:tonkin-1964-08-04-destroyers-report-evading-torpedoes-and-having-sunk:0
1504 Aug 1964 16:30Report 12: boat reports an enemy aircraft falling into the sea
Read: 'enemy aircraft was observed falling into the sea; enemy vessel perhaps wounded'. Mentions aircraft; the date-time group in the OCR is smudged (04/1630Z per Prados).
single documentmain link, n:tonkin-1964-08-04-report-12-boat-reports-an-enemy-aircraft:0
1604 Aug 1964 16:44Report 13: 'we shot at two enemy airplanes... we sacrificed two comrades'
Read. The report speaks of aircraft, not ships. Hanyok: it appears to combine two separate messages into one translation, and 'comrades' was rendered as 'boats'; the original Vietnamese text cannot be located.
reported documentmain link, n:tonkin-1964-08-04-report-13-we-shot-at-two-enemy:0, n:tonkin-1964-08-04-report-13-we-shot-at-two-enemy:1
1704 Aug 1964 17:27 to 18:27Herrick's doubt message SENT (1:27 p.m. Washington time)
Prados, quoting a 28 Aug 1964 chronology: contacts 'appear doubtful'; 'freak weather effects' and 'over-eager sonarmen'; 'no visual sightings'. DISCREPANCIES: (1) earlier reports said the message was received at 1:27 p.m.; the chronology says sent. (2) The bar spans 17:27 to 18:27 UTC because it is unclear whether 'Washington time' means daylight time (UTC-4) or the UTC-5 that Prados uses to convert. The message itself was not read.
disputed analysisn:tonkin-1964-08-04-herrick-s-doubt-message-sent:0
1805 Aug 1964 12:00White House staff meeting memo (8 a.m. EDT): evidence 'less than we had yesterday'
Read. Bundy: evidence for the second attack 'less than we had yesterday', 'eliminating double counting and mistaken signals'; 'This much seemed certain: There was an attack.' Also: he 'welcomed the recent events as justification for a resolution the Administration had wanted for some time.'
reported documentmain link, n:tonkin-1964-08-05-white-house-staff-meeting-memo-evidence-less:0, n:tonkin-1964-08-05-white-house-staff-meeting-memo-evidence-less:1
1920 Feb 1968 (date only)1968: McNamara cites 'unimpeachable' intercepts to the Senate; does not leave copies
Opening statement of 20 February 1968, quoted by Prados.
single analysisn:tonkin-1968-02-20-mcnamara-cites-unimpeachable-intercepts-to-the-senate:0
2024 Jun 1970 (date only)24 Jun 1970: Senate votes 81-10 to repeal the Tonkin Resolution (Dole amendment)
Read in the Congressional Record, p. 21132 [No. 167 Leg.]. The ten nays include Fulbright, who said in the same debate 'I am going to vote for its repeal' and objected to the procedure (p. 21119). See claim tonkin-resolution-repealed-1970. Voteview record: To amend h.r. 15628 by repealing the gulf of tonkin resolution effective at the end of the 91st congress. Result: n/a; yea 81, nay 10. Roll call 398.
single officialmain link, n:vote-RS0910398:0, n:vote-RS0910398:1
2120 Jan 1972 (date only)1972: NSA's deputy director concedes the 4 Aug intercept could refer to 2 Aug
Hanyok's note 7: a 20 January 1972 meeting between Dr. Louis Tordella and SFRC staff chief Carl Marcy; Tordella could not produce the original.
single analysismain link, n:tonkin-1972-01-20-nsa-s-deputy-director-concedes-the-4:0
2209 Nov 1995 (date only)1995: Giap tells McNamara in Hanoi that nothing happened on 4 Aug
Seattle Times report of the 9 Nov 1995 meeting.
single median:tonkin-1995-11-09-giap-tells-mcnamara-in-hanoi-that-nothing:0
2320 Jun 1997 12:00 to 23 Jun 1997 12:001997: Hanoi conference; Giap says 2 Aug was ordered by a local command
Prados attended; he reports Giap's statement to McNamara (his note 13).
single analysisn:tonkin-1997-06-20-hanoi-conference-giap-says-2-aug-was:0
242001 (year only)Early 2001: Hanyok study in NSA's classified Cryptologic Quarterly
Per the National Security Archive's 2005 posting.
single documentmain link, n:tonkin-2001-03-01-hanyok-study-in-nsa-s-classified-cryptologic:0
25Mar 2003 (month only)March 2003: the five intercept reports declassified
Prados: declassified in March 2003 on a Mandatory Declassification Review request. The scan carries a NARA review stamp dated 3-13-03.
reported documentmain link, n:tonkin-2003-03-15-the-five-intercept-reports-declassified:0, n:tonkin-2003-03-15-the-five-intercept-reports-declassified:1
2601 Dec 2005 (date only)1 Dec 2005: NSA declassifies about 140 documents, including the Hanyok study
National Security Archive posting of 1 December 2005.
reported documentn:tonkin-2005-12-01-nsa-declassifies-about-140-documents-including-the:0, n:tonkin-2005-12-01-nsa-declassifies-about-140-documents-including-the:1

People and bodies involved

Sources

Generated from timeline.yaml by build/tools/render_timeline.py. This page records what is reported and where reports differ. It is not a finding about what happened.